|
Post by GalaxiaD on Aug 21, 2011 14:50:25 GMT -5
N-... No?
|
|
|
Post by Blue Ninjakoopa on Aug 21, 2011 14:58:47 GMT -5
Yeah, no.
|
|
|
Post by L33tSilvie on Aug 21, 2011 16:53:03 GMT -5
Bisexual?
|
|
|
Post by GalaxiaD on Aug 21, 2011 17:38:53 GMT -5
Sexually confused?
|
|
|
Post by L33tSilvie on Aug 21, 2011 17:42:40 GMT -5
Pansexual?
|
|
|
Post by GalaxiaD on Aug 21, 2011 17:43:46 GMT -5
Asexual?
|
|
|
Post by L33tSilvie on Aug 21, 2011 17:46:53 GMT -5
Heterosexual?
|
|
|
Post by GalaxiaD on Aug 21, 2011 17:47:57 GMT -5
Sadomasopedorobonecrobestiality?
|
|
|
Post by Blue Ninjakoopa on Aug 21, 2011 18:00:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by L33tSilvie on Aug 22, 2011 1:39:39 GMT -5
Oh.
|
|
|
Post by GalaxiaD on Aug 22, 2011 12:51:05 GMT -5
Weird heterosexual then, 'cause there ain't nothin' attractive about that sparkly bastard.
|
|
|
Post by Blue Ninjakoopa on Aug 22, 2011 14:11:44 GMT -5
I don't judge guys, so uhh yeah lol.
|
|
|
Post by GalaxiaD on Aug 22, 2011 18:21:14 GMT -5
Coming from the guy who noted JFK's attractiveness.
|
|
|
Post by Blue Ninjakoopa on Aug 22, 2011 18:26:30 GMT -5
I said he was handsome (followed by "no homo", iirc), you're judging Robert Pattinson like a potential mate.
|
|
|
Post by GalaxiaD on Aug 23, 2011 16:03:15 GMT -5
Nonsense. I'm just noting his lack of masculinity and am curious as to why that appeals to anyone.
|
|